Cases 1 - 10 of 193
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00732
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Early v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
Wayne Early
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Christopher Brunelle, Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Gayne et al
as 3:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Wayne Rogers
Defendant:
Gerard Gayne and M. Binezewski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinsey v. Thomas Health Care, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv01586
Plaintiff:
Faith McKinsey
Defendant:
Thomas Health Care, LLC, Kareen Thomas and Wayne Thomas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Rogers v. Fontaine et al
as 3:2023cv01350
Plaintiff:
Wayne Rogers
Defendant:
Rachel Fontaine, Santiago, USman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Quintana et al
as 3:2023cv01278
Plaintiff:
Wayne Rogers
Defendant:
Samuel Quintana, Perez and Marcus Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Rogers v. Gagne et al
as 3:2023cv00770
Plaintiff:
Wayne Rogers
Defendant:
Gerard Gagne and M. Binezewski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lamoureaux v. Stover
as 3:2023cv00627
Petitioner:
Donald Wayne Lamoureaux
Respondent:
R. Stover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rodgers v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv00557
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Rodgers
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc Review of SSA Decision SSDC - Concurrent Title II and Title XVI Claims
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
