Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Bolden v. Moyer et al
as 1:2018cv03213
Defendant:
Stephen T. Moyer, Gwendolyn Oliver, A. Lyles and others
Plaintiff:
Isaac T. Bolden, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lee v. The Maryland Division of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv00439
Plaintiff:
John Lee
Defendant:
The Maryland Division of Corrections , Wayne A. Webb , Patricia Goins-Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Moyer et al
as 8:2015cv03745
Petitioner:
Jermaine D. Harris
Respondent:
Stephen T. Moyer, Wayne A. Webb and Frank B. Bishop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tarpley v. Hogan et al
as 1:2015cv00735
Plaintiff:
Steven E. Tarpley
Defendant:
Larry Hogan, Carroll A. Parrish, Wayne A. Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tarpley v. Parrish et al
as 1:2015cv00592
Plaintiff:
Steven E. Tarpley
Defendant:
Carroll A. Parrish, Greg L. Hershberger, Wayne A. Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Bishop, Jr. et al
as 8:2014cv02816
Plaintiff:
Walter Edward Hall
Defendant:
Frank B. Bishop, Jr., Richard E. Miller, Captain R.M. Friend and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ryidu-X v. Webb et al
as 1:2014cv02408
Petitioner:
Malcom Maxwell Ryidu-X
Respondent:
Wayne A. Webb, Md. Correctional Instituion-Hagerstown and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Southall v. Webb et al
as 8:2013cv03642
Petitioner:
Romonda Southall
Defendant:
Wayne A. Webb and Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Webb et al v. Jordan et al
as 5:2013cv01121
Plaintiff:
Wayne E Webb and Judith A Webb
Defendant:
Jeremy L Jordan and City of Shreveport
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Delaney, Jr v. Webb et al
as 1:2013cv00766
Petitioner:
Shawn Michael Delaney, Jr
Respondent:
Wayne A. Webb and The Attorney General Of The State Of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
