Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Cooks v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2018cv02695
Petitioner:
Donald Wayne Cooks
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas Ingrassia v. Unknown Kim, et al
as 16-4110
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Thomas J. Ingrassia
Defendant:
Keith Schafer, Felix Vincenz, Julie Inman and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Unknown Kim, Psychiatrist/Physician, SORTS, in her individual capacity, Ron Moore, RN, SORTS, in his official and individual capacity, Kaylynn Reed, RN, SORTS, in her official and individual capacity and others
Appellee:
Robert Dolan
Cooks v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2016cv02428
Petitioner:
Donald Wayne Cooks
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cooks v. USA
as 3:2016cv01773
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Anthony Wayne Cooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Robert McQueen v. James LeBlanc, et al
as 15-30982
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT MCQUEEN
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT C. TANNER, WAYNE COOK and DOCTOR CASEY MCVEA
Randy Cook v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-10532
Petitioner - Appellant:
RANDY WAYNE COOK
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Sandifer v. Tanner et al
as 2:2014cv02992
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Sandifer
Defendant:
Robert C Tanner, Wayne Cook, Casey McVea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McQueen v. LeBlanc et al
as 2:2014cv00174
Plaintiff:
Robert McQueen
Defendant:
James M LeBlanc, Raman Singh, Robert C Tanner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cockrum v. Ellis et al
as 2:2013cv04860
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Louis Cockrum
Defendant:
Simon Ellis, Robert Tanner, Wayne Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davenport v. Cook et al
as 2:2013cv04828
Plaintiff:
Andrew Davenport
Defendant:
Wayne Cook, Casey McVea, Bessie Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
