Cases 1 - 10 of 19
CHAVIS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2020cv01441
Defendant:
WETZEL, DIRECTOR OF PRISON HEALTH SERVICE UNIT, S.C.I. WAYMART, U.M. KAY and others
Plaintiff:
CHAVIS and RONALD CHAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01450
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
R.B. v. Hollibaugh et al
as 1:2016cv01075
Plaintiff:
R.B.
Defendant:
Lisa Hollibaugh, Jon D. Fisher, Jay Whitesel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2015cv00283
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Wilson
Defendant:
Rhonda Ellett, Lori White, McDonough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUNTER v. GAVIN et al
as 2:2015cv00565
Petitioner:
VITO HUNTER
Respondent:
WAYNE GAVIN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RICE v. GAVIN et al
as 2:2015cv00291
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY RICE
Respondent:
WAYNE GAVIN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ronald Williams v. Wayne Gavin, et al
as 15-1144
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD C. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
WAYNE GAVIN, Superintendent, LT. HORVATH, Sone Lieut., C.O. DANIEL DREVENEK and others
Ronald Williams v. Joseph Nish, et al
as 15-1143
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD C. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH P. NISH, Former Superintendent, KAREN ROGERS-SWEENEY, Program Coordinator, WAYNE GAVIN, Superintendent and others
THOMAS v. GAVIN
as 2:2013cv01815
Petitioner:
ROGER LEE THOMAS
Respondent:
WAYNE GAVIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
REED v. GAVIN et al
as 2:2013cv04257
Petitioner:
ARTHUR REED
Respondent:
WAYNE GAVIN, PA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL and YORK COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
