Cases 1 - 9 of 9
McKowen v. Morris, et al
as 26-1190
Plaintiff:
JOHN R. MCKOWEN
Defendant:
WISTAR MORRIS, GREG HARRINGTON, TWO RIVERS FARMS F-2, INC. and others
In re: McKowen, et al
as 25-1361
Petitioner:
JOHN R. MCKOWEN
Respondent:
WISTAR MORRIS, GREG HARRINGTON, TWO RIVERS FARMS F-2, INC. and others
McKowen v. Harrington et al
as 1:2025cv00708
Plaintiff:
John R. McKowen
Defendant:
Greg Harrington, Two Rivers Farms F-2, INC., Two Rivers Water & Farming Company and others
Counter-Claimant:
Wayne Harding
Counter-Defendant:
John R. McKowen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
HARDING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv03975
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WAYNE HARDING
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HARDING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv97029
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MIKE WAYNE HARDING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Paulson v. Two Rivers Water and Farming Company et al
as 1:2019cv02639
Defendant:
Two Rivers Water and Farming Company, Timothy Beall, Wayne Harding and others
Plaintiff:
John Paulson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452
Harding v. General Dynamics Corporation et al
as 3:2016cv01820
Defendant:
General Dynamics Corporation and Electric Boat Corp
Plaintiff:
Wayne Harding
Pecial_master:
James Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Harding v. General Dynamics Corporation et al
as 5:2016cv01820
Defendant:
General Dynamics Corporation and Electric Boat Corp
Plaintiff:
Wayne Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Harding v. Davidson County Sheriff Office et al
as 3:2013cv00449
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Wayne Harding
Defendant:
L. Mitchell, f/n/u Holland and L. T. Garmon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
