Cases 31 - 40 of 163
LEWIS v. RUYMANN
as 1:2020cv18548
Defendant:
JOHN ANDREW RUYMANN
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WAYNE LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth LewisIn re: Kenneth Lewis
as 20-3450
Respondent:
ANN WILLIAMS, ELLEN E. BOSHKOFF, BRADLEY MURPHY and others
Petitioner:
In re: KENNETH WAYNE LEWIS
LEWIS v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2020cv06200
Respondent:
THE UNITED STATES POST OFFICE, THE UNITED STATES TREASURY DEPARTMENT, THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Petitioner:
KENNETH WAYNE LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LEWIS v. RUYMANN
as 2:2020cv05918
Defendant:
JOHN ANDREW RUYMANN
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WAYNE LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOUGLAS et al v. LALUMIERE et al
as 2:2020cv00227
Defendant:
DAVID CLARKE, ANDRE BELLUCCI, BLR CAPITAL LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOEL DOUGLAS, JAMES LEWIS and STEVEN FOWLER
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
LEWIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv29587
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOEY WAYNE LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Zone Five, LLC et al v. Textron, Inc. et al
as 6:2020cv01059
Plaintiff:
BTICG Leasing, Inc., Wayne Lewis, Aginty, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Textron Aviation Rhode Island, Inc., Textron Inc, Textron Aviation Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
The Estate of Robert Wayne Lew, et al v. County of Cumberland New Jerse, et al
as 20-1147
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THE ESTATE OF ROBERT WAYNE LEWIS, by and through it's administrator Ad Prosequendum, Tammy Wilson and TAMMY WILSON
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND NEW JERSEY, CFG HEALTH SYSTEMS LLC and WARDEN ROBERT BALICKI, in his individual capacity
LEWIS v. THE ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION et al
as 1:2019cv19231
Defendant:
THE ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION and KAYLEIGH ANGLUM
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WAYNE LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
