Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv03287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Weeks (PS) v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2026cv04282
Plaintiff:
Jobadiah Sinclair Weeks
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv03217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv03178
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv06033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv03158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv03135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
WEEKS v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al
as 2:2026cv06620
Plaintiff:
REBECCA WEEKS
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Keaton v. Mississippi Delta Community College et al
as 4:2026cv00162
Plaintiff:
Cameron Keaton
Defendant:
Mississippi Delta Community College, City of Moorhead, Mississippi, Indianola Family Medical Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Beleauxn v. Weeks et al
as 2:2026cv09509
Defendant:
Selena Gispon, Breezae Weeks, Baby Lungs and others
Plaintiff:
Athena A. Beleauxn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
