Cases
Bridges v. Lumpkin
as 21-40431
Petitioner / Appellant: Weldon Boyce Bridges
Respondent / Appellee: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Weldon Bridges v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 20-40296
Petitioner / Appellant: WELDON BOYCE BRIDGES
Respondent / Appellee: LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Bridges v. Director TDCJ We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2017cv00002
Petitioner: Weldon Boyce Bridges
Respondent: Director TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bridges v. Livingston et al
as 2:2013cv00195
Plaintiff: Weldon Boyce Bridges
Defendant: Brad Livingston, Rissi Owens, Charles McDuffie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weldon Bridges v. N. Arnold, et al
as 12-11168
Plaintiff - Appellant: WELDON BOYCE BRIDGES, also known as Weldon Bridges
Defendant - Appellee: N. ARNOLD, Warden, P. PONDER, Classification and DAVID R. BASSE, Medical Director
Weldon Bridges v. N. Arnold, et al
as 12-11090
Plaintiff - Appellant: WELDON BOYCE BRIDGES, also known as Weldon Bridges
Defendant - Appellee: N. ARNOLD, Warden, P. PONDER, Classification, DAVID R. BASSE, Medical Director and others
Weldon Bridges v. N. Arnold, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-10864
Plaintiff - Appellant: WELDON BOYCE BRIDGES, also known as Weldon Bridges
Defendant - Appellee: N. ARNOLD, Warden, P PONDER, Classification and DAVID R BASSE, Medical Director
Bridges v. Arnold et al
as 2:2012cv00015
Plaintiff: Weldon Boyce Bridges
Defendant: N Arnold, P Ponder, David R Basse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bridges v. City of Lufkin et al
as 9:2009cv00065
Plaintiff: Weldon Boyce Bridges
Defendant: City of Lufkin, Lufkin Police Dept., Angelina County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?