Cases 1 - 10 of 1,120
Comerica Bank v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA
as 2:2024cv11039
Plaintiff:
Comerica Bank
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Nettles v. State of Tennessee Government et al
as 2:2024cv02241
Plaintiff:
Doris Ann Nettles
Defendant:
State of Tennessee Government, Melanie Taylor Jefferson d/b/a Chancellor of the Chancery Court of Shelby County Tennessee, Joedae L. Jenkins d/b/a Chancellor of the Chancery Court of Shelby County Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cynthia Lundeen v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 24-3193
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA MAREK LUNDEEN
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00435
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Mohammad v. Wells Fargo Bank
as 1:2024cv00400
Plaintiff:
Rashid Mohammad
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Healy v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2024cv01028
Plaintiff:
Patrick Healy
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank N.A. and Does 1 through 5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Forsburg v. Wells Fargo & Co. et al
as 2:2024cv01030
Plaintiff:
Gerald Forsburg, Jenna Doctor, Luis Castro and others
Defendant:
Wells Fargo & Co. and Wells Fargo Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Green et al v. Wells Fargo & Company et al
as 2:2024cv01027
Interested Party:
Pamela Delpapa
Plaintiff:
Samara Green, Brett Jacob and Charles Johnson
Defendant:
Wells Fargo & Company and Wells Fargo Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
