Cases 61 - 70 of 157
McCullough v. Clinton County et al
as 4:2023cv00171
Plaintiff:
Darla McCullough
Defendant:
Clinton County, Wellpath, LLC, Jeremy Shank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUNG v. HALLMAN et al
as 2:2023cv00268
Plaintiff:
KARLESTER YOUNG
Defendant:
KIP HALLMAN, PAUL NOEL, JOHN OR JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YOCUM v. TERRA et al
as 2:2023cv00201
Plaintiff:
CHARLES YOCUM
Defendant:
J TERRA, MS MENYA, DR LETIZIO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROTEN v. LITTLE et al
as 2:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
ISIAH ANDREW ROTEN
Defendant:
GEORGE LITTLE, TABB BICKELL, MICHAEL ZAKEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01836
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Balliet v. Luzerne County et al
as 3:2022cv02032
Plaintiff:
William Balliet
Defendant:
Luzerne County, City of Pittston, Wellpath, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MAULSBY v. EPHRAIN et al
as 2:2022cv04840
Defendant:
Librarian Phillip Ephraim, PA DEPT. OF CORRECTION, Secretary GEORGE LITTLE and others
Plaintiff:
VERNON MAULSBY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
ALEXANDER v. THORNLEY et al
as 3:2022cv00224
Plaintiff:
KEITH ALEXANDER
Defendant:
CASEY THORNLEY, PATRICK NAGLE, DEANNA DELLATORRE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BURK v. SGT. TAYLOR et al
as 2:2022cv04747
Plaintiff:
ISHMAEL A. BURK
Defendant:
SGT. TAYLOR, MS. BELLINGER, LT. PROSSER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. WELLPATH MEDICAL et al
as 2:2022cv04701
Plaintiff:
SHEKIR THOMAS
Defendant:
WELLPATH MEDICAL, MR. SHAPPERD, MR. TERRA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
