Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Wesley Johnson v. Illinois Department of Correct, et al
as 20-2947
Defendant / Appellee:
SIU ENT, MATTHEW JOHNSON, JOHN & JANE DOES, Medical Dental and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WESLEY JOHNSON
Johnson v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv03150
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, SIU ENT, John Does and Jane Does Medical Dental and others
Plaintiff:
Wesley Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wesley Johnson, Jr. v. Tracie Newton, et al
as 19-2261
Defendant / Appellee:
TRACIE H. NEWTON, RICHARD CORNFORTH, BRENDAN KELLY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WESLEY JOHNSON, JR.
Johnson v. Katterman et al
as 3:2019cv03039
Plaintiff:
Wesley Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
Katterman and Chief Administrative Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Wesley Johnson Jr.
as 1:2018cv05055
Defendant:
Wesley Johnson Jr.
In Re:
Wesley Johnson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Johnson, Jr. v. City Of Rockford et al
as 3:2018cv50168
Plaintiff:
Wesley Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
City Of Rockford, Brian Merten and Jordan Austin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv01727
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
WESLEY JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Johnson v. Wilt et al
as 3:2015cv50298
Plaintiff:
Wesley Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
Randy Wilt, Shore, Rachel Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Newton et al
as 3:2015cv50294
Plaintiff:
Wesley Johnson , Jr.
Defendant:
Tracie Newton, Winnebago County Jail, Rockford Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wesley Johnson v. Theo Glover, et al
as 14-3003
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WESLEY JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
THEO GLOVER, DEVLIN JOSEPH SCHOOP, GREGORY ROBERT JAMES, JR. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
