Real Property Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 96
West Virginia Department of Transportation, Division of Highways et al v. Virginia Electric and Power Company
as 2:2010cv00144
Petitioner: West Virginia Department of Transportation, Division of Highways and Paul A Mattox, Jr.
Respondent: Virginia Electric and Power Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
West Virginia Department of Transportation, Division of Highways et al v. Virginia Electric and Power Company
as 2:2010cv00143
Petitioner: West Virginia Department of Transportation, Division of Highways and Paul A Mattox, Jr.
Respondent: Virginia Electric and Power Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
West Virginia Department of Transportation, Division of Highways et al v. Virginia Electric and Power Company et al
as 2:2010cv00142
Petitioner: West Virginia Department of Transportation, Division of Highways and Paul A Mattox, Jr.
Respondent: Virginia Electric and Power Company and Chase Manhattan Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
West Virginia Department of Transportation, Division of Highways et al v. Virginia Electric and Power Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00141
Petitioner: West Virginia Department of Transportation, Division of Highways and Paul A Mattox, Jr.
Respondent: Virginia Electric and Power Company and Chase Manhattan Bank
Consol_defendant: Trans-Allegheny Interstate Line Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Payne v. State of West Virginia Public Land Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv01279
Plaintiff: Hobart E. Payne
Defendant: State of West Virginia Public Land Corporation and Division of Natural Resources, Office of Lands and Streams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Mark Davis v. Mike Rutherford We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-1091
Plaintiff - Appellee: MARK E. DAVIS and TAMMY L. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee: REO AMERICA, INCORPORATED, a Florida corporation, and any and all persons and REBUILD AMERICA, INCORPORATED, a Florica Corporation
Defendant: MIKE RUTHERFORD, Sheriff of Kanawha County, VERA MCCORMICK, Clerk of the County Commission of Kanawha County and 100 JOHN DOES, having or claiming any interest in real estate identified as 51 Woodbridge Drive, Charleston, West Virginia
Movant - Appellant: HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK, N.A.
City National Bank of West Virginia v. Smith et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv01148
Plaintiff: City National Bank of West Virginia and City National Bank of West Virginia
Defendant: Mark K. Smith, Lisa D. Smith, United States Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2409 (a) Quiet Title Action
Type: Real Property None
Homeland Training Center, LLC v. Summit Point Automotive Resear We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-2272
Plaintiff - Appellant: HOMELAND TRAINING CENTER, LLC, A Tennessee Limited Liability Company
Defendant - Appellee: SUMMIT POINT AUTOMOTIVE RESEARCH CENTER, a West Virginia Limited Liability Company, individually and in its capacity as Trustee of the William Scott Inter Vivos Trust
Defendant - None: WILLIAM SCOTT INTER VIVOS TRUST
Homeland Training Center, LLC v. Summit Point Automotive Resear
as 08-2273
Plaintiff - Appellee: HOMELAND TRAINING CENTER, LLC, A Tennessee Limited Liability Company
Defendant - Appellant: SUMMIT POINT AUTOMOTIVE RESEARCH CENTER, a West Virginia Limited Liability Company, individually and in its capacity as Trustee of the William Scott Inter Vivos Trust
Defendant - None: WILLIAM SCOTT INTER VIVOS TRUST
Berger et al v. Comcast of Pennsylvania/Washington/West Virginia LP
as 2:2008cv00320
Plaintiff: Cary E Berger, Cary E Berger, KC Charles Inc and others
Defendant: Comcast of Pennsylvania/Washingtion/West Virginia LP and Comcast of Pennsylvania/Washingtion/West Virginia LP
Cause Of Action: Diversity

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?