Cases 1 - 10 of 133
Westbrook v. Chattanooga Hamilton County Hospital Authority
as 1:2023cv00216
Plaintiff:
Theresa Westbrook
Defendant:
Chattanooga Hamilton County Hospital Authority d/b/a Erlanger Health System and Erlanger Health, Chattanooga Hamilton County Hospital Authority doing business as Erlanger Health System and Erlanger Health
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00771
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00743
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Westbrook v. Bonner et al
as 2:2023cv02094
Plaintiff:
Rachel Westbrook
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, Jr., Kirk Fields, Michael Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00975
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Employment Discrimination
Westbrook v. United States of America
as 2:2020cv02353
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Devion Westbrook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Westbrook v. Moore et al
as 2:2018cv02805
Plaintiff:
Iran Westbrook
Defendant:
Lt. Connolly, Kirt Fields, Robert L. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford v. Westbrooks et al
as 3:2018cv01273
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Jarod Ford
Defendant:
David Westbrooks, Karyleen Rivera and Tony Mays
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moody v. Westbrooks
as 3:2017cv01452
Petitioner:
Deangelo Montez Moody
Respondent:
Bruce Westbrooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bennett v. Parker, et al.
as 3:2017cv01176
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
Tony Parker, Donna Turner, Mandy Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
