Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Benjamin Oryang v. Waugh, et al
as 24-11287
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN BEDOGWAR ORYANG
Defendant:
WAUGH, PERRYMAN, BELL and others
Alexander v. Dunn et al
as 7:2024cv00419
Plaintiff:
Betty Alexander
Defendant:
Commissioner Jefferson Dunn, Commissioner Ruth Naglich, Warden Christopher Gordy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hudson v. Fuller et al
as 7:2023cv01715
Plaintiff:
Brian Hudson
Defendant:
Fuller, Angela Miree, Lucy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Renney v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2023cv00361
Plaintiff:
Joseph Allen Renney
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Commissioner John Hamm, Commissioner Jeff Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
William T. Walker v. Corizon LLC, et al
as 22-13094
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM T. WALKER
Defendant / Appellee:
CORIZON LLC, JEFFERSON DUNN, WARDEN and others
Poores v. Hamm et al
as 5:2022cv01034
Plaintiff:
Clinton Lee Poores
Defendant:
John Hamm, Crabtree, Schaffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Surles v. Conn et al
as 2:2022cv01025
Plaintiff:
Christopher Surles
Defendant:
Daniel Conn, Blalock, Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fair v. Perkins et al
as 5:2022cv00781
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Lynn Fair
Defendant:
Perkins, Wexford Health Services and Ciox Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fair v. Westbrook et al
as 5:2022cv00679
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Lynn Fair
Defendant:
Jeffery T Westbrook, Christopher Gordy, Perkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Wexford Health Services et al
as 5:2022cv00500
Plaintiff:
Dexter Harris
Defendant:
Wexford Health Services, ADOC Limestone Correctional Facility and Alabama, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
