Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Braselton et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv05738
Plaintiff:
Steve Braselton, Evette Brown, Raymond Whitten and others
Defendant:
The 3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Carrier Global Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Hill v. Whitten Center et al
as 6:2023cv05731
Plaintiff:
Marteebia Hill
Defendant:
Whitten Center, Elizabeth Redd and Craig Byrd
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Thompson et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv03300
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Tamar Thompson, William Spangler, Randall Lynn Spaustat and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Whitten v. Mays et al
as 7:2023cv00399
Plaintiff:
Antwon Whitten
Defendant:
C. Mays, Gibson and Grubb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Antwon Whitten v. J.G. Johnson
as 23-6553
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTWON WHITTEN
Defendant / Appellee:
J. G. JOHNSON, Correctional Officer
Antwon Whitten v. J.G. Johnson
as 23-6304
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTWON WHITTEN
Defendant / Appellee:
J. G. JOHNSON, Correctional Officer
Whitten v. The Rape Crisis Center Serving Horry and Georgetown Counties Inc et al
as 4:2022cv02010
Plaintiff:
Tracy Whitten
Defendant:
The Rape Crisis Center Serving Horry and Georgetown Counties Inc and Lucy Richards
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Antwon Whitten v. Harold Clarke
as 22-6540
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTWON WHITTEN
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Whiten v. Clarke
as 2:2020cv00570
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Petitioner:
Antwon Gairrio Whiten and Antwon Gairrio Whitten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Earl Vennings, Jr. v. Beatrice Whitten
as 20-1490
Defendant / Appellee:
BEATRICE E. WHITTEN
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EARL VENNINGS, JR.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
