Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Whitten v. The 71st District Harrison County Court, Texas
as 2:2024cv00276
Petitioner:
Landon Whitten
Defendant:
The 71st District Harrison County Court, Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Whitten v. Vandenrandt et al
as 4:2021cv00566
Plaintiff:
Kelsie Raymond Whitten, Jr.
Defendant:
Amber Vandenrandt and UTMB Cole Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Johnson et al
as 3:2019cv00673
Defendant:
Deputy Smith, T Breaux, C L Fondren and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Lavelle Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierson v. White et al
as 5:2019cv00235
Defendant:
Attorney General New Mexico, Attorney General Arizona, San Diego County Sheriffs Office and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Pierson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chambers v. Catoe et al
as 6:2018cv00429
Defendant:
Deadra Martin, Jeffery W Catoe, Jeffery Richardson and others
Plaintiff:
Jamar Conrad Chambers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitten v. Davis
as 1:2017cv01176
Respondent:
Director Lorie Davis
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
William Whitten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eddie Whitten v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 16-41003
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDDIE RAY WHITTEN
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Whitten v. Director TDCJ
as 9:2016cv00029
Petitioner:
Eddie Ray Whitten
Respondent:
Director TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
La Tidtus Jones v. James Moore, et al
as 14-60740
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LA TIDTUS JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES MOORE, Warden, LIEUTENANT STANDLEY DOUGLAS, OCTAVIOUS HARRIS and others
La Tidtus Jones v. Marily Kelly, et al
as 14-60633
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LA TIDTUS JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
MARILY L. KELLY, Clerk, BOLIVAR COUNTY CIRCUIT CLERK'S OFFICE, LORETTA JONES, Deputy Clerk and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
