Cases 1 - 10 of 1,612
Johnson et al v. Bay Shore Development Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv01762
Plaintiff:
Laurens Johnson and Carol Ann Paolo
Defendant:
Bay Shore Development Corporation, JOHN DOE (11-20) and ABC CORPORATIONS 1-8
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Rent Lease & Ejectment
Johnson v. Carrols Corp. et al
as 1:2024cv01548
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Carrols Corp., Restaurant Brand International Inc., Burger King and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Johnson v. Lewis et al
as 1:2024cv01316
Plaintiff:
Jerrod Johnson
Defendant:
Sgt. Lewis and CO II Lorke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Sgt. Upole et al
as 1:2024cv01221
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Glenn Evans
Defendant:
Sgt. Upole, Ofc. Kock, Sgt. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Trustees of the National Electrical Benefit Fund v. Johnson Peltier Electric
as 8:2024cv01222
Plaintiff:
TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL BENEFIT FUND
Defendant:
Johnson Peltier Electric
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Johnson v. Progressive Insurance
as 8:2024cv01193
Plaintiff:
David Antone Johnson
Defendant:
Progressive Insurance
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Villages at Morgan Metro v. Polk et al
as 8:2024cv01198
Plaintiff:
Shae'Nika T. Polk
Defendant:
Villages at Morgan Metro, Ross Mailman, Lisa Hall Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 ra Race Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
