Cases 41 - 50 of 92
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02999
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Pointer aka Robert Davis Jr v. Minton et al
as 1:2016cv00464
Plaintiff:
Demetric A Pointer aka Robert Davis Jr
Defendant:
Minton, Harvey, Coppinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chambers v. Tennessee Board of Regents et al
as 2:2016cv02851
Plaintiff:
Brianna Necole Chambers
Defendant:
Tennessee Board of Regents, Southwest Tennessee Community College, James White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chambers v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv02633
Movant:
Dylon Chambers
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Chambers v. Whirlpool Corporation
as 3:2016mc00031
Movant:
Allen McDonald and Christopher T Cain
Plaintiff:
Steve Chambers
Defendant:
Whirlpool Corporation
Demarcus Chambers v. USP Victorville
as 2:2016cv02413
Petitioner:
Demarcus L. Chambers
Respondent:
USP Victorville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Chambers v. Correct Care Solution et al
as 3:2015cv01021
Plaintiff:
Willie Chambers
Defendant:
Nurse Practitioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. Memphis Police Department et al
as 2:2015cv02606
Plaintiff:
Terrell Dreshun DeAndre Johnson and Hope Chambers
Defendant:
Memphis Police Department and City Of Memphis, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flaherty v. Pigeon Forge Chamber of Commerce et al
as 1:2015cv00159
Plaintiff:
Dennis Flaherty
Defendant:
Pigeon Forge Chamber of Commerce and DOE 1-5
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Bradford et al v. Servicemaster Holding Corp. et al
as 2:2015mc00001
Petitioner:
Jennifer L Bradford , Raymond L Cox , Charles Chambers and others
Defendant:
Servicemaster Holding Corp. , The Servicemaster Company, Inc. , The Terminix International Company, Inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
