Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Hartley v. Cate et al
as 3:2023cv01337
Plaintiff:
Donald Wayne Hartley
Defendant:
Nathan Cate, Criminal Clerk's Office, Metro Impound Lot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christensen v. Kingsport Sessions Court Div III et al
as 2:2023cv00174
Plaintiff:
Joshua Micah Christensen
Defendant:
Kingsport Sessions Court Div III, Assistant District Attorney and Sullivan County Public Defender's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blondin v. Bedford County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2019cv00957
Defendant:
Bedford County Public Defender's Office, Bedford County Emergency Medical Service and Bedford County Sheriff's Department
Plaintiff:
Michael Joseph Blondin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lassiter v. State of Tennessee, et al
as 2:2018cv02304
Plaintiff:
Richard A. Lassiter
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Memphis Police Department, Shelby County Public Defender's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02235
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02768
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02479
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Huddle v. Honoski et al
as 2:2015mc00016
Plaintiff:
Larry Keith Huddle, Jr.
Defendant:
Amy M. Honoski and Sullivan County Public Defender's Office
Huddle v. Honoski et al
as 2:2015cv00291
Plaintiff:
Larry Keith Huddle, Jr.
Defendant:
Amy M. Honoski and Sullivan County Public Defender's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Redwine v. Rutherford County Public Defender's Office
as 3:2015cv00598
Petitioner:
Jason Lowell Redwine
Respondent:
Rutherford County Public Defender's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
