Cases 31 - 40 of 109
Hart v. Cuyahoga County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2017cv00188
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Hart
Defendant:
Cuyahoga County Sheriff's Department and Gatz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Lechner v. Marquette, County of et al
as 2:2017cv00020
Plaintiff:
John Francis Lechner
Defendant:
Marquette, County of, Marquette County Board of Commissioners, Gerald O. Corkin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Yarbro v. Leibach et al
as 3:2017cv00055
Plaintiff:
Marlon Yarbro
Defendant:
Hardin County Sheriff's Department and Jason Caldwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Augustin et al v. Bradley County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2017cv00019
Plaintiff:
Abraham A Augustin and Lorrance B Dais
Defendant:
Bradley County, Tennessee, Bradley County Sheriff's Department and Jimmy Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Oakland County Government et al
as 2:2017cv10139
Plaintiff:
Bryan Jones
Defendant:
Oakland County Government, 6th Circuit Judicial County Court, Oakland County Sheriff's Department and others
Sims v. Freeman et al
as 1:2017cv00013
Plaintiff:
Jewel Sims
Defendant:
Leotis Freeman, Steven Johnson, Mike Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abdullah v. Quist et al
as 1:2017cv00024
Plaintiff:
Saabir Abdullah
Defendant:
George Jay Quist, Kent County Courthouse, Kent County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simpson v. Putnam County Sheriff's Department
as 2:2016cv00109
Plaintiff:
Brandon Simpson
Defendant:
Putnam County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bevins v. Becker County, Minnesota et al
as 4:2016cv02942
Plaintiff:
Corey Bevins
Defendant:
Becker County, Minnesota, Becker County Jail, Becker County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stone v. Sevier County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2016cv00588
Plaintiff:
Justin Stone
Defendant:
Sevier County Sheriff's Department and Quality Health Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
