Cases 1 - 10 of 2,448
Vick v. Temple et al
as 3:2024cv00662
Defendant:
Anthony Johnson, Sgt. Smith, Officer Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
Nazeer Dijon Vick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01620
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Disability Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00514
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Johnson v. United States Of America
as 1:2024cv00029
Defendant:
United States Of America
Plaintiff:
Dana Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Johnson v. CNY Regional Market Authority
as 2:2024cv00562
Defendant:
CNY Regional Market Authority
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00619
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00620
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Johnson v. Richmond City Sheriff Office
as 3:2024cv00492
Petitioner:
Laquan Rotell Johnson
Respondent:
Richmond City Sheriff Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cooper v. Johnson et al
as 7:2024cv00576
Defendant:
Staff and Johnson
Plaintiff:
Thad Gilbert Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson et al v. Old Southwest Health and Rehabilitation, LLC et al
as 7:2024cv00574
Defendant:
Old Southwest Health and Rehabilitation, LLC, Roanoke Opco Holdco LLC, Birchwood Park Rehabilitation and Nursing LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Kraeema Johnson and Ketitia Stanley
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 Equal Pay Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
