Cases 41 - 50 of 600
Smith v. Maddox et al
as 1:2023cv03853
Plaintiff:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Defendant:
Melody M. Maddox, Steve Blackman, Tyrone Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MADDOX v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv21825
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MADDOX
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03453
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
Smith v. Maddox et al
as 1:2023cv03454
Petitioner:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddox, A. Morrell, Andrea Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03452
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
Maddox Fine Art LTD. v. Dergham
as 9:2023cv81046
Plaintiff:
Maddox Fine Art Ltd.
Defendant:
Ghada Dergham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
SHEFFIELD v. BROWN et al
as 5:2023cv00192
Plaintiff:
ANDRE L SHEFFIELD
Defendant:
MICHAEL BROWN, LEWIS, UNKNOWN CELL EXTRACTION TEAM #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MADDOX v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv16960
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH MADDOX
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MADDOX v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv16653
Plaintiff:
ERVIN MADDOX
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Walker v. Ragazino et al
as 1:2023cv02827
Plaintiff:
Toni P. Walker and Anthony Walker, Sr.
Defendant:
James Eric Ragazino, Delquis R. Mendoza, Beverly Dwyer and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
