Cases 1 - 10 of 704
Lobato Quito v. Garland
as 24-1297
Petitioner:
MILTON WLADIMIR LOBATO QUITO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Williams (Bynum)
as 24-1253
Defendant:
WILLIAM BYNUM, ALAN ANDERSON, TERRENCE WILLIAMS and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Garcia Miranda v. BK Auto Repair & Collision LLC et al
as 1:2024cv03385
Plaintiff:
Milton Ismael Garcia Miranda
Defendant:
BK Auto Repair & Collision LLC doing business as BK Wash & Repair Center, Mohammed Awad and Mohammad Hassan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02738
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Milton v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
as 1:2024cv02562
Plaintiff:
Cameron Milton
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Milton v. Osborn CI et al
as 3:2024cv00636
Plaintiff:
Marcus Milton
Defendant:
Osborn CI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez v. Hasan et al
as 1:2024cv02232
Plaintiff:
Milton Rodrigo Camargo Lopez
Defendant:
Ali Hasan and Otash Express, LLC,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Duche-Masabanda v. Garland
as 24-699
Petitioner:
MILTON ESTUARDO DUCHE-MASABANDA, MARCIA ROCIO GUANO-CUNALUIZA and MAFER SCARLETT DUCHE-GUANO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Wilmington PT Corp. v. Mitra et al
as 1:2024cv01830
Plaintiff:
Wilmington PT Corp.
Defendant:
Ranjit Kumar Mitra, Jacob Milton, Mofazzal Hossain and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191 Bank Foreclosure
Owens v. City of Milford et al
as 3:2024cv00286
Plaintiff:
Marvin E. Owens
Defendant:
City Of Milford, Milford Police Department, Andrade Milton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
