Cases 1 - 10 of 273
Conner v. Warden et al
as 1:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
John Henry Conner, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden, Merick Garland and Colet Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Schubert v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Allan Schubert
Defendant:
M. Gonzales, S. Thorne, R. D. Malone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hammons v. Peters et al
as 5:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Britt Jarriel Hammons
Defendant:
Colette Peters, Linda Gete, C. Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Echols v. Cutright
as 1:2023cv00761
Petitioner:
Olivia Toy Echols
Respondent:
C. Cutright and Collette Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00311
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Ortiz-Vargas v. Brown et al
as 5:2023cv00306
Petitioner:
Efrain Ortiz-Vargas
Respondent:
Warden Brown and Director of BOP C. Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Smith v. Peters
as 5:2023cv00304
Plaintiff:
Jason Jerell Smith
Defendant:
Ms. Corlette Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Johnson v. Peters et al
as 5:2023cv00298
Plaintiff:
Dennis J. Johnson
Defendant:
Colette S. Peters, Warden R. Brown and Chaplain Hong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Cicchiello v. Peters
as 3:2023cv00188
Petitioner:
Joan Cicchiello
Respondent:
Colette S. Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
VB BTS, LLC v. Jefferson County, West Virginia et al
as 3:2023cv00171
Plaintiff:
VB BTS, LLC
Defendant:
Jefferson County, West Virginia and The Jefferson County Planning Commission
Petitioner:
Corey T. Ash, Tommy Ash, Cheryl Avery and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
