Cases 41 - 50 of 62
Simmons v. Colvin
as 2:2014cv00246
Plaintiff:
Sheryl R Galloway Simmons
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lawson v. Warner et al
as 3:2014cv05100
Plaintiff:
Geoffrey Robert Lawson, Sr
Defendant:
Bernard Warner, Kim Wyman, Jeffrey A Uttecht and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv06023
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. Colvin
as 3:2013cv05671
Plaintiff:
Annika Tschudy Simmons
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
Leaming v. Simmons et al
as 2:2013cv00759
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Wayne Leaming
Defendant:
J. Simmons, Meyer and Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons et al v. Quality Loan Service Corp. of Washington et al
as 2:2013cv00302
Plaintiff:
Matthew Simmons and Simmons Jennifer
Defendant:
Quality Loan Service Corp. of Washington , Quality Loan Service Corporation , JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Kiessling v. Simmons et al
as 2:2013cv00037
Plaintiff:
Bruce J Kiessling
Defendant:
James M Simmons and Vicki L Simmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Underwriters at Lloyd's London v. Big Sky Industries, LTD et al
as 2:2012cv01623
Plaintiff:
Underwriters at Lloyd's London
Defendant:
Big Sky Industries Ltd, Bellmont Terrace LLC, Canyon Holdings LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kiessling v. Simmons et al
as 2:2012cv00518
Plaintiff:
Bruce J Kiessling
Defendant:
James M Simmons and Vicki L Simmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Underwriters at Lloyd's London v. Big Sky Industries, LTD et al
as 2:2012cv01392
Plaintiff:
Underwriters at Lloyd's London
Defendant:
Big Sky Industries, LTD, Bellmont Terrace, LLC, Canyon Holdings, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
