Cases 1 - 10 of 378
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01516
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sx Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination (Sex)
Whitaker v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Scott Whitaker
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Beardsley et al v. County of Saratoga
as 1:2023cv01641
Plaintiff:
Brendan Beardsley, Nicole Hollner, Susan Traver and others
Defendant:
County of Saratoga
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
USA v. $117,154.00 in United States Currency et al
as 3:2023cv01596
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$117,154.00 in United States Currency
Claimant:
Fred Whitaker
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Whitaker et al v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.
as 1:2023cv09841
Plaintiff:
Austin Whitaker and Tina Louise Hughitt
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. and Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl Diversity-Product Liability
McTerrell v. Five Points C.F. et al
as 9:2023cv00920
Plaintiff:
Sean McTerrell
Defendant:
Five Points C.F., J. Morley, Mohawk C.F. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McTerrell v. Doe et al
as 1:2023cv06661
Plaintiff:
Sean McTerrell
Defendant:
Five Points C.F., J. Morley, Mohawk C.F. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitaker v. Brown
as 1:2023cv00669
Plaintiff:
Ramona Pando Whitaker
Defendant:
Clinton E. Brown and Clinton Brown
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Glover et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2022cv10261
Plaintiff:
Robert Glover, Jerome Givens, Cynthia Corona and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
