Cases 11 - 20 of 7,005
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00766
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Williams v. Morales
as 3:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
Billy Williams
Defendant:
Morales
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Facility Dixon C.C. et al
as 3:2024cv50173
Plaintiff:
Micah Anderson
Defendant:
Facility Dixon C.C., Construction Trade Worker, Contract Incorporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cornille v. Myers et al
as 3:2024cv01202
Defendant:
Administrative Review Board, William Loy, Percy Myers and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley J Cornille, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. BELLO et al
as 1:2024cv00747
Plaintiff:
MARCUS WILLIAMS
Defendant:
BELLO, BAKER, AKENADI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jennings v. Clarkson et al
as 3:2024cv03101
Plaintiff:
Peter Jennings
Defendant:
. Clarkson, . Howard, William Coonrod and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Doe #1 et al
as 2:2024cv00505
Plaintiff:
Dominic Williams
Defendant:
Jane Doe #1, Jane Doe #2 and Jane Doe #3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tuck v. Condreva et al
as 1:2024cv03425
Plaintiff:
William Tuck
Defendant:
Condreva, Lammert and Starling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Hyatte et al
as 3:2024cv00342
Defendant:
William Hyatte, Bill, Pully and others
Plaintiff:
Imari Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sweet v. Williams et al
as 1:2024cv03306
Plaintiff:
Derek I. Sweet
Defendant:
Latanya Williams, Lola, Stateville Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
