Cases 11 - 20 of 1,600
Sanchez v. Jacob et al
as 6:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Felipa D. Sanchez
Defendant:
Ryan P. Jacob, Williams Sausage Co. Inc. and Tyson Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Loggins v. Huffman et al
as 6:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Lee Anthony Loggins
Defendant:
J. Huffman, C. Kirkland, Unknown Agent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bode v. Fairview City of The et al
as 5:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
William Shane Bode
Defendant:
Fairview The City of, Steve Tanio, Philip Fletcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moon v. Richison et al
as 5:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Chesley Moon
Defendant:
Chad Richison, Henry C. Duques, Robert J. Levenson and others
Thomsen v. Armfield et al
as 5:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
William C Thomsen
Defendant:
Cory Armfield and New Cordell City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Green v. Hobbs et al
as 5:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Monae Green, Marylin Monae Porter and Lamone M Johnson
Defendant:
Williams Hobbs, FNU Walls, FNU Weber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wildman et al v. Integon National Insurance Company
as 6:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
William Warren Wildman, Jr. and Mary Kelly Wildman
Defendant:
Integon National Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stevens v. Rankins
as 4:2024cv00053
Petitioner:
Rodger D. Stevens
Respondent:
William Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stevens v. Rankins
as 6:2024cv00047
Petitioner:
Rodger D. Stevens
Respondent:
William Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
