Cases 1 - 10 of 14,858
STACY v. TEMPLE et al
as 1:2024cv00712
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM RICHARD STACY
Defendant:
DYLAN TEMPLE, TEMPLE, SANDERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. I.D.O.C. et al
as 2:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CLAYTON JACKSON
Defendant:
I.D.O.C., FRANK VANIHEL and WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. I.D.O.C. et al
as 2:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CLAYTON JACKSON
Defendant:
I.D.O.C., WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, F. VANIHEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caraballo v. Forgey et al
as 2:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Frank Caraballo
Defendant:
William Forgey, M.D. and Correctional Health Indiana, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Luckey v. Williams et al
as 2:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Luckey
Defendant:
Jerry Williams and T.H. Ryan Cartage Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Callahan v. Dart et al
as 3:2024cv00311
Plaintiff:
William M Callahan, II
Defendant:
Tom Dart and Cook County Doctor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kitchen v. Robert Bosch LLC
as 1:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
William Kitchen
Defendant:
Robert Bosch LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
WILLIAMS v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00660
Petitioner:
LONNIE WILLIAMS
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JACKSON v. I.D.O.C et al
as 2:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CLAYTON JACKSON
Defendant:
I.D.O.C, FRANK VANIHEL and WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Galipeau et al
as 2:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Jerry Smith and Jerry A Smith
Defendant:
Kenneth J Falk, John Galipeau, Kenneth Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
