Cases 21 - 30 of 286
JP MORGAN MORTGAGE ACQUISITION CORP v. WILLIAMS
as 1:2023cv00013
Plaintiff:
JP MORGAN MORTGAGE ACQUISITION CORP
Defendant:
ANTHONY SCOTT WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
SCHUSTER v. WILLIAMS
as 1:2022cv00359
Plaintiff:
JOHN SCHUSTER
Defendant:
DANNY WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
WICKHAM v. UNITED STATES
as 2:2023cv00002
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM J WICKHAM
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FULLER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv00331
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM A FULLER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
ROUSSEL v. MAYO et al
as 1:2022cv00285
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH F ROUSSEL
Defendant:
WILLIAM MAYO, SCOTT WILCOX, RYAN BAILEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DICKEY
as 1:2022cv00254
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
WILLIAM C DICKEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
MORGAN v. CMG MORTGAGE INC
as 2:2022cv00232
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MORGAN doing business as CMG FINANCIAL and WILLIAM MORGAN
Defendant:
CMG MORTGAGE INC and CMG MORTGAGE INC doing business as CMG FINANCIAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
HALEY v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 1:2022cv00211
Plaintiff:
AARON WILLIAM HALEY
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
WILLIAMS v. STATE OF MAINE
as 1:2022cv00197
Plaintiff:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - HABEAS CASES
Petitioner:
JEFFREY WILLIAMS
Respondent:
STATE OF MAINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SHAW et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 1:2022cv00142
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM SHAW and LUCRETIA SHAW
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
