Cases 1 - 10 of 28
DAVIS v. TRANS UNION, LLC, et al
as 2:2023cv01113
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM PHILIP DAVIS
Defendant:
TRANS UNION LLC, TRANS UNION RENTAL SCREENING SOLUTIONS, INC., and RENTSPREE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01200
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
DAVIS v. GRABER et al
as 2:2014cv01416
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM S. DAVIS, JR.
Defendant:
LYLE GRABER, ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA , ALLEGHENY COUNTY OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEWLON et al v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2013cv01213
Plaintiff:
DANIELLE (STILLWELL) NEWLON and TYLER NEWLON
Defendant:
WILLIAM S. DAVIS, JR. and THE BOROUGH OF WHITAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHASE v. GOV. MARTIN J. O'MALLEY et al
as 3:2012cv00180
Petitioner:
WARREN CHASE
Respondent:
GOV. MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, LT. GOV. ANTHONY G. BROWN, SECRETARY STATE, JOSHUA SHATSTERN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Arnold et al
as 1:2012cv00587
Plaintiff:
William D. Davis
Defendant:
Todd M. Arnold, Edward V. Grynkewicz, III and Edwin R. Powell, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv48814
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM J. DAVIS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
DAVIS v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv38001
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM J DAVIS
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
DAVIS et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv64537
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM WILSON DAVIS and MARY LOU DAVIS
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARPENTERS COMBINED FUNDS, INC. v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2011cv00452
Plaintiff:
CARPENTERS COMBINED FUNDS, INC.
Defendant:
WILLIAM C. DAVIS and CATHERINE ANN DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
