Cases 1 - 10 of 24
BNSF Railway Company v. Coates
as 5:2018cv06063
Plaintiff:
BNSF Railway Company
Defendant:
William P Coates, Jr. and William P. Coates, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
William Coats v. Muhammad Chaudhri, et al
as 17-17025
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM THOMAS COATS
Defendant - Appellee:
MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRI and SAO, Dr.
Sciabucuchi v. Southcoast Financial Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv04352
Plaintiff:
Matthew Sciabucuchi
Defendant:
Southcoast Financial Corporation , L Wayne Pearson , James P Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coats v. Chaudhri et al
as 1:2013cv02032
Plaintiff:
William Thomas Coats
Defendant:
Muhammed Chaudhri, MD and Sao
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vinmar International Ltd. et al
as 1:2013cv05264
Plaintiff:
Vinmar International Ltd. , Bercen, Inc , Sellukem AB and others
Defendant:
Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A.
Thirdparty_defendant:
Deltech Corporation, Stolt Nielsen USA, Inc. and Stolt Tank Containers B.V.
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1101 Violation of Maritime Regulations
William Coats v. HDSP, et al
as 12-15195
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM THOMAS COATS
Defendant - Appellee:
HIGH DESERT STATE PRISON, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, R. MIRANDA and others
William Coats v. Michael Fox
as 11-18085
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM THOMAS COATS
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL FOX, Dr.
William Coats v. Mike McDonald, et al
as 11-17765
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM THOMAS COATS
Respondent - Appellee:
MIKE MCDONALD, Warden and EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr.
William Coats v. Michael McDonald
as 11-72443
Petitioner:
WILLIAM THOMAS COATS
Respondent:
MICHAEL MCDONALD
William Coats v. Michael McDonald
as 11-16974
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM THOMAS COATS
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL MCDONALD, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
