Cases 1 - 10 of 35
TACCINO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2022cv03115
Plaintiff:
VRINDER SINGH RANDHAWA, WILLIAM A. TACCINO and CAROL J. TACCINO
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, US CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taccino et al v. Trump et al
as 1:2022cv01981
Plaintiff:
William A. Taccino and Carol J. Taccino
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, Christopher Wray, Christie Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Carol Taccino v. City of Cumberland
as 22-1590
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CAROL J. TACCINO and WILLIAM A. TACCINO
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CUMBERLAND, MARYLAND, ALLEGANY COUNTY, JENNIFER CLEM and others
William Taccino v. Act 1st Federal Credit Union
as 21-2019
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM A. TACCINO and CAROL J. TACCINO
Defendant / Appellee:
ACT 1ST FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
William Taccino v. Edmund Taccino
as 20-1966
Defendant / Appellee:
EDMUND J. TACCINO
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM A. TACCINO
William Taccino v. Dollar Tree Stores, Incorporated
as 21-1306
Defendant / Appellee:
DOLLAR TREE STORES, INCORPORATED
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CAROL J. TACCINO and WILLIAM A. TACCINO
ACT 1st Federal Credit Union v. Taccino et al
as 1:2021cv00905
Defendant:
Carol Jean Taccino and William Anthony Taccino
Plaintiff:
ACT 1st Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Taccino et al v. Act 1st Federal Credit Union
as 1:2021cv00840
Defendant:
Act 1st Federal Credit Union
Plaintiff:
Carol J. Taccino and William A. Taccino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 la
Taccino et al v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.
as 1:2020cv03494
Plaintiff:
Carol J. Taccino and William A. Taccino
Defendant:
Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taccino v. Taccino
as 1:2020cv02160
Defendant:
Edmund J. Taccino
Plaintiff:
William A. Taccino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
