Cases 31 - 40 of 65
Patterson v. Sullivan
as 2:2018cv01031
Petitioner:
Vester L. Patterson
Respondent:
William J. Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Patterson v. Sullivan
as 1:2018cv00361
Petitioner:
Vester L. Patterson
Respondent:
William J. Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Patterson v. Sullivan
as 1:2018cv00038
Petitioner:
Vester L. Patterson
Respondent:
William J. Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Turner v. Sullivan et al
as 1:2017cv01737
Plaintiff:
Steven Deon Turner, Jr.
Defendant:
William J. Sullivan, J. Busby, Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Sullivan et al
as 1:2017cv00595
Plaintiff:
Steven Deon Turner, Jr.
Defendant:
William Joe Sullivan, J. Busby, Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald Martinez v. Kathleen Allison, et al
as 14-16880
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD F. MARTINEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN ALLISON, Warden, Warden Acting at California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility (CSATF), KENT CLARK, Warden of California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility (CSATF), WILLIAM J. SULLIVAN, Associate Director of General Population (Sacramento) and others
Lopez v. Allison et al
as 1:2013cv02010
Plaintiff:
Adam Lopez
Defendant:
K. Allison, Kent Clark, William J. Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Sullivan v. William Stephens, Director
as 13-10883
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM MARK SULLIVAN
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
William Sullivan v. William Stephens, Director
as 13-10870
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM MARK SULLIVAN
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Sullivan v. Director TDCJ
as 4:2013cv00586
Petitioner:
William Mark Sullivan
Respondent:
William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
