Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Ates et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2024cv00392
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
James L Ates, Ronald Abrantes, Kendra Tennille Abron and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Ates et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv01743
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
James L Ates, Ronald Abrantes, Kendra Tennille Abron and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
AMBROSE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv03515
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM AMBROSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ambrose v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2019cv00606
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
William Ambrose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ambrose v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2019cv00607
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
William Ambrose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AMBROSE v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2019cv00608
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
William Ambrose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ambrose v. Med South Inc
as 2:2017cv00332
Plaintiff:
William Ambrose
Defendant:
Med South Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ambrose v. Knight et al
as 3:2013cv00376
Plaintiff:
William Ambrose
Defendant:
Joey Knight, New Market Police Department and Jefferson County, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ambrose v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 3:2013cv00332
Plaintiff:
William Ambrose
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ambrose et al v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2008cv00809
Plaintiff:
William Ambrose
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
