Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv09595
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2ot Job Discrimination (other)
Clorissa Porter, et al v. Southern NV Adult Mental Healt, et al
as 18-15360
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLORISSA D. PORTER and WILLIAM D. SPENCER
Defendant - Appellee:
SOUTHERN NEVADA ADULT MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES, a mental health treatment operation licensed by the State of Nevada, AKA Rawson-Neal Psychiatric Hospital, CHELSEA SZKLANY, and as Hospital Administrator re: Southerm Nevada Adult Mental Health Services, LINDA J. WHITE, and as statewide Psychiatric Medical Director of the State of Nevada and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-2017
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-2013
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Porter et al v. Southern Nevada Adult Mental Health Services et al
as 2:2016cv02949
Defendant:
Chelsea Szklany, Kyle Devine, M.D. Jacob Manjooran and others
Plaintiff:
Clorissa D. Porter and William D. Spencer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-1500
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-56224
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-55350
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv03772
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
