Cases 1 - 10 of 149
Gray v. Danforth
as 1:2024cv01751
Petitioner:
Ronald B. Gray
Respondent:
Warden William Danforth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cannon v. Danforth et al
as 5:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Juan Antonio Cannon
Defendant:
William Danforth and Paul Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newman v. Danforth
as 1:2023cv00105
Petitioner:
Anthony Quinn Newman
Respondent:
Warden William Danforth and Tyrone Oliver
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nelson Mickens, Jr. v. William Danforth
as 23-12653
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NELSON MICKENS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM DANFORTH
Weaver v. CoreCivic et al
as 5:2023cv00061
Plaintiff:
Windell Weaver
Defendant:
CoreCivic, William Danforth, Ricky Stone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plunkett v. Ward et al
as 5:2023cv00065
Plaintiff:
Stephen Christopher Plunkett
Defendant:
TIMOTHY C WARD, Damon Henninger, William Danforth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mickens v. Danforth
as 5:2023cv00049
Plaintiff:
Nelson Mickens, Jr.
Defendant:
William Danforth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plunkett v. Ward et al
as 2:2023cv00122
Plaintiff:
Stephen Chris Plunkett and Stephen Christopher Plunkett
Defendant:
Timothy C Ward, Damon Henninger, William Danforth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Danforth et al
as 5:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
Michael G. Davis
Defendant:
Warden William Danforth, Ricky Stone, Dr. Tucker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. State Of Georgia et al
as 2:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Brown
Defendant:
State Of Georgia, William Danforth and Kourtney Gay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
