Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Browder v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 2:2019cv00029
Petitioner:
William Daniel Browder
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Daniels et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 6:2018cv00066
Plaintiff:
William Daniels and Delaine Daniels
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. Cada et al
as 4:2018cv00064
Plaintiff:
William Daniel Thomas
Defendant:
Chad Cada , Douglas Ritter, Joshua Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Griffin et al
as 4:2016cv00902
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Matthew Carl Griffin and William Daniel Griffin
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Browder v. Stephens
as 3:2014cv00248
Petitioner:
William Daniel Browder
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Browder v. Stephens
as 3:2014cv00198
Petitioner:
William Daniel Browder
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Verhaeghe et al
as 1:2013cv00050
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Colleen Johnson
Defendant:
Sarah Anna William Verhaeghe, William Verhaeghe and William Daniel Denis Verhaeghe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Moore et al v. County of Brazoria, Texas et al
as 3:2011cv00391
Plaintiff:
William Daniel Moore and Danny Royce Murphy
Defendant:
County of Brazoria, Texas, Mary Cheline Shine, Rodney Garrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dawkins v. Statewide Beverage, LLC
as 7:2010cv00441
Plaintiff:
William Daniel Dawkins
Defendant:
Statewide Beverage, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Garcia et al v. Coil Tubing Services, L.L.C. et al
as 4:2009cv03500
Plaintiff:
Noe Garcia, Paul Henderson, Rolando Ramirez and others
Defendant:
Coil Tubing Services, L.L.C., Smith International Inc., Jerry Ritter and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
