Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Nair et al v. Toth et al
as 2:2023cv00454
Defendant:
John Doe, Alex Toth, Paul Lee and others
Plaintiff:
Jayakumar Sundaran Nair, Rajakumari Susheelkumar, Jayakrishnan Krishnan Nair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Doss v. Foster et al
as 8:2022cv00144
Plaintiff:
Surgret Urania Doss
Defendant:
William Foster, Hillsborough County, Dominick Desiato and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01344
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00052
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michele A. Dobson et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2016cv08366
Defendant:
DI Linda Bossenmeyer, CAMP FIRE WRAP USA, Kelly Callahan, M.D. and others
"CLC":
Childrens Law Center Of California
Plaintiff:
Michele A Dobson and Michele A. Dobson
Christine Lacy v. City of St. Petersburg, Florid, et al
as 14-14986
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTINE LACY, an Individual
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF ST. PETERSBURG, FLORIDA, a municipal corporation, WILLIAM FOSTER, a Former Mayor and CHUCK HARMON, Chief of Police
:
SERVICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00482
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00236
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
