Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Ball v. Citibank
as 2:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
William H Ball
Defendant:
Citibank a New York Corporation doing business as Sears Shop Your Way
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01816
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01817
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
William H. Ball v. Soboba Economic Development Corporation
as 5:2023cv00083
Plaintiff:
William H. Ball
Defendant:
Soboba Economic Development Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
William H. Ball v. Pechanga Economic Development Corporation et al
as 5:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
William H. Ball
Defendant:
Pechanga Economic Development Corporation, Patty Chang, Maria Ferris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
HAWTHORNE, K.A. et al v. MUNICIPALITY OF NORRISTOWN et al
as 2:2015cv01572
Plaintiff:
SALIMA HAWTHORNE, K.A. , SALIMA HAWTHORNE and AMEER JOHNSON
Defendant:
MUNICIPALITY OF NORRISTOWN , WILLIAM H. BALL and DAQUAN BAILEY
Cross_claimant:
WILLIAM H. BALL and MUNICIPALITY OF NORRISTOWN
Cross_defendant:
DAQUAN BAILEY and MUNICIPALITY OF NORRISTOWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell et al v. BP, PLC et al
as 2:2010cv01472
Plaintiff:
James Kirk Mitchell , Brad Abshire , Scotty Allen and others
Defendant:
BP, PLC, BP Exploration & Production, Inc., BP Products North America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 1333
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
