Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Foster, III v. Nye et al
as 4:2022cv00199
Plaintiff:
William Henry Foster, III
Defendant:
George Nye, David Setzer and Bradley Hipps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOWNS v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv09390
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HENRY DOWNS
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fennell v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2016cv02280
Plaintiff:
Robert Fennell
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Jeffery A. Beard, Francis Pirozolla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thornton v. USA
as 1:2016cv00994
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
William Henry Thornton, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
JAMES v. SAUERS et al
as 2:2014cv00328
Petitioner:
WILLIAM HENRY JAMES, II
Respondent:
D. SAUERS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HENRY v. OFFICIALS OF THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2013cv02325
Defendant:
OFFICIALS OF THE CUMBERLAND COUNTY JAIL
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HENRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOOD et al v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2012cv06395
Plaintiff:
TATANISHA HOOD, RONSHON BOWSER, DANTEE FORREST and others
Defendant:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SUPERIOR COURT OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY and CUMBERLAND COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Harrison v. K. Smith, et al
as 10-1865
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM HENRY HARRISON
Defendant - Appellee:
K. SMITH, (Case Manager, FCI Ft.Dix), CARROLL, (Unit Manager, FCI Ft. Dix), BARRETT, (Case Manager, USP Canaan) and others
William Harrison v. Ronnie Holt, et al
as 09-4194
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM HENRY HARRISON
Defendant - Appellee:
RONNIE HOLT and FED BUR PRISONS
COLEMAN v. GRONDOLSKY
as 1:2009cv03509
Petitioner:
WILLIAM HENRY COLEMAN
Respondent:
JEFF GRONDOLSKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
