Cases 1 - 10 of 17
PETER et al v. WOJCICKI et al
as 1:2022cv00332
Plaintiff:
MARIA PETER, MICHAEL PETER, JULIKA BERGER and others
Defendant:
SUSAN WOJCICKI, WILLIAM HENRY GATES, STPHANE BANCEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Peter et al v. Wojcicki et al
as 1:2022cv00049
Plaintiff:
Maria Peter, Michael Peter, Julika Berger and others
Defendant:
Susan Diane Wojcicki, William Henry Gates, Stephane Bancel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Carr v. Dart et al
as 1:2021cv03150
Defendant:
Cook County Health Care Dispensary, Tom Dart, C/O's of 7-3 Shift and others
Plaintiff:
William Henry Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carr v. Dart et al
as 1:2021cv02983
Defendant:
Name(s) Unknown: (Entire) Cook, Name Unknown: Dir. of Security, County Administration and others
Plaintiff:
William Henry Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. Sower et al
as 1:2020cv00160
Plaintiff:
Georiea Hawkins
Defendant:
William Henry Sower and DJS Trucking Express Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EASLEY v. CLARK COUNTY et al
as 4:2017cv00233
Defendant:
SAM BEARD, B. BOWER, CLARK COUNTY and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HENRY EASLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EASLEY v. SNELLING et al
as 4:2017cv00188
Defendant:
BEARD, GILTNER, LIMBACH and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HENRY EASLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EASLEY v. MOSS
as 4:2017cv00158
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HENRY EASLEY
Defendant:
S. MOSS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EASLEY v. SNELLING et al
as 4:2017cv00122
Defendant:
BEARD, BILLINGSLEY, BOLEY and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HENRY EASLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstrong v. Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00624
Plaintiff:
William Henry Armstrong
Defendant:
Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , Auxilium Pharmaceutical, Inc. , Pfizer, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
