Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Icker v. Grimaldo et al
as 5:2024ct03086
Plaintiff:
Mark Eric Icker
Defendant:
G. Grimaldo, C. Newsom, Mr. Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Beltran v. Holzapfel
as 5:2023hc02223
Petitioner:
Hilario Renato Mendoza Beltran and Hilario Mendoza Beltran
Respondent:
Warden William Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Perez Gonzalez v. Holzapfel
as 5:2023hc02190
Petitioner:
Julio Cesar Perez Gonzalez
Respondent:
Warden William Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Villanueva-Raygoza v. Holzapfel
as 5:2023hc02189
Petitioner:
Gabino Villanueva-Raygoza
Respondent:
William Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bashir v. Holzapfel et al
as 5:2023hc02187
Petitioner:
El-Amin Bashir
Respondent:
Warden William Holzapfel and Warden A. Boncher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hernandez v. Holzapfel
as 5:2023hc02174
Petitioner:
Jose Gregorio Hernandez
Respondent:
Warden William Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Beltran v. Holzapfel
as 9:2023cv00929
Petitioner:
Hilario Renato Mendoza Beltran and Hilario Mendoza Beltran
Respondent:
William Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hernandez v. Holzapfel
as 5:2023hc02170
Petitioner:
Juan Hernandez
Respondent:
Warden William Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Segura v. Holzapfel
as 5:2023hc02156
Petitioner:
Daniel Segura
Respondent:
Warden William Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rodriguez v. Holzapfel
as 5:2023hc02148
Petitioner:
Julio Rodriguez
Respondent:
Warden William Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
