Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Isgar v. 16th Circuit Court of Jackson County, Probate Division
as 4:2022cv00522
Plaintiff:
William Isgar
Defendant:
16th Circuit Court of Jackson County, Probate Division
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Isgar v. Camden County Sheriffs, et al.
as 2:2022cv04039
Plaintiff:
William Isgar
Defendant:
Camden County Sheriffs and Camden County Courts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Isgar v. Camden County Sheriffs
as 4:2021cv01451
Plaintiff:
William Isgar
Defendant:
Camden County Sheriffs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Isgar v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2020cv01594
Defendant:
State of Missouri and Koeplan Aaron
Plaintiff:
William Isgar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Isgar v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2020cv00879
Defendant:
State of Missouri and Koeplan Aaron
Plaintiff:
William Isgar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Isgar v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2019cv00859
Defendant:
Prosecutors of 26th Judicial Court, State of Missouri, Judge Aaron Koepper and others
Plaintiff:
William Isgar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Isgar v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2019cv00857
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Jackson County Missouri and Jackson County Probate Court of Missouri
Plaintiff:
William Isgar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Isgar v. Uber Technologies Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv00957
Defendant:
Uber Technologies Inc., Uber USA and Raiser LLC
Plaintiff:
William Isgar
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Isgar v. Mental Health Detention Centers et al
as 4:2017cv01045
Plaintiff:
William Isgar
Defendant:
Mental Health Detention Centers and FDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Isgar v. Kansas City Police Department et al
as 4:2017cv00151
Plaintiff:
William Isgar
Defendant:
Kansas City Police Department, Kansas City Animal Control, Kansas City Police Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
