Cases 21 - 30 of 30
JONES v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv32662
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM J. JONES
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01995
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
William Jones v. Ventura County Sheriff's Dept, et al
as 09-55451
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM J. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Defendant:
CANTWELL, Deputy, ILANO #3123, Senior Deputy, J. PONCE, #2772, Senior Deputy and others
William Jones v. Ventura Cnty Sheriff
as 2:2003cv06151
Defendant:
Bohya, Bob Brooks, Burns #4174 and others
Plaintiff:
William J Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William J Jones v. Mike Knowles
as 2:2007cv03906
Petitioner:
William J Jones
Respondent:
Mike Knowles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garden City Boxing Club Inc v. Brown et al
as 5:2007cv00628
Plaintiff:
Garden City Boxing Club Inc
Defendant:
Dale Brown, Dale Brown, Becky Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nordyke, et al v. King, et al
as 07-15763
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUSSELL ALLEN NORDYKE, ANN SALLIE NORDYKE, dba TS Trade Shows, DENNIS BLAIR, R.L. ADAMS; ROGER BAKER; MIKE FOURNIER; VIRGIL MCVICKER and others
Amicus Curiae:
YOUTH ALIVE!, CALIFORNIA POLICE CHIEFS' ASSOCIATION, CALIFORNIA PEACE OFFICERS' ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant / Appellee:
WILMA CHAN, COUNTY OF ALAMEDA BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, MARY V. KING and others
Nordyke, et al v. King, et al
as 07-15763
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUSSELL ALLEN NORDYKE, ANN SALLIE NORDYKE, dba TS Trade Shows, JESS B. GUY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY V. KING, GAIL STEELE, WILMA CHAN and others
Amicus Curiae:
PROFESSORS OF LAW, THE NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, CALIFORNIA RIFLE & PISTOL ASSOCIATION and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
