Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Joseph Hume v. William Hughes, et al
as 19-14229
Defendant / Appellant:
WILLIAM L. HUGHES, KERRY LOVELESS and MILLS-CONOLY ENGINEERING, P.C.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOSEPH MICHAEL HUME
Hughes v. BERRYHILL
as 8:2019cv01328
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff:
William L. Hughes
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hume v. Hughes
as 2:2016cv00954
Plaintiff:
Joseph Michael Hume
Defendant:
William L Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TRIAD FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC v. RURAL CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMENT, INC et al
as 2:2011cv01158
Plaintiff:
TRIAD FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC
Defendant:
RURAL CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMENT, INC, WILLIAM L. HUGHES, LUCINDA C. HUGHES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters' Employee Benefits Fund et al v. Crawford Door Sales, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv13746
Plaintiff:
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Employee Benefits Fund, Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Annuity Fund, Carpenters Pension Trust Fund - Detroit and Vicinity and others
Defendant:
Crawford Door Sales, Inc. and William L. Hughes
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1101 E.R.I.S.A.
Type:
Other Statutes
Iron Workers Local 25 Pension Fund et al v. Crawford Door Sales, Incorporated et al
as 2:2009cv12370
Plaintiff:
Iron Workers Local 25 Pension Fund, Iron Workers Health Fund of Eastern Michigan, Iron Workers Local 25 Vacation Pay Fund and others
Defendant:
Crawford Door Sales, Incorporated, William L Hughes and Todd Hughes
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Type:
Labor
Iron Workers Local 25 Pension Fund et al v. Crawford Door Sales, Incorporated et al
as 2:2008cv11119
Plaintiff:
Iron Workers Local 25 Pension Fund, Iron Workers Local 25 Individual Account Retirement Fund, Iron Workers Health Fund of Eastern Michigan and others
Defendant:
Crawford Door Sales, Incorporated and William L Hughes
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
