Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Lewis v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2019cv00411
Petitioner:
Paul William Lewis
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lewis v. Total Transportation of Mississippi LLC (TV1)
as 3:2019cv00382
Defendant:
Total Transportation of Mississippi, LLC
Plaintiff:
William Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miles v. Cox et al
as 3:2019cv00623
Defendant:
David Cox, Christopher Owens, Sandra Brandon and others
Plaintiff:
William Lewis Miles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lanham v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv01064
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
William Lewis Lanham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Lindsey v. Corizion Medical Staff et al
as 2:2017cv00112
Plaintiff:
Jakeil D Lindsey
Defendant:
Corizion Medical Staff, Bledsoe County Correction Complex Security, Russell Melton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Walker et al (TV2)
as 3:2016cv00486
Plaintiff:
Paul William Lewis
Defendant:
Darlene M. Walker, Thomas Barclay , Blake Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Hawkins et al (TV1)
as 3:2016cv00315
Plaintiff:
Paul William Lewis
Defendant:
Keith Hawkins and Scott County Sheriffs Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowles v. Mass Mutual Life Insurance Company et al
as 2:2015cv02677
Defendant:
Mass Mutual Life Insurance Company , PennyMac Loan Services LLC and Weiss Spicer Cash PLLC
Plaintiff:
William Lewis Bowles
Miscellaneou:
Virginia Gray
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
Bowles v. Mass Mutual Life Insurance Company et al
as 2:2015cv02679
Plaintiff:
William Lewis Bowles
Defendant:
Mass Mutual Life Insurance Company, PennyMac Loan Services, LLC and Weiss Spicer Cash PLLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
Rippy v. Crawford
as 3:2013cv00150
Plaintiff:
William Lewis Rippy
Defendant:
Tony Crawford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
