Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Morris v. City of Harrisville et al
as 2:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Mr William M Morris, Esq and William Morris
Defendant:
Harrisville City, Michelle Tait, Jennie Knight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Employment)
Barnett v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al
as 2:2014cv13563
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company , Patrick H McKay, William M. Morris and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Barnett
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
MORRIS et al v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
as 3:2010cv00056
Plaintiff:
SHANNON D. MORRIS and WILLIAM M. MORRIS
Defendant:
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
William M. Morris v. Acands Inc, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-71666
Defendant:
Acands Inc
Plaintiff:
William M. Morris
William M. Morris v. Cooper Industries, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-72298
Defendant:
Cooper Industries
Plaintiff:
William M. Morris
William M. Morris v. M H Detrick Co.
as PAE/2:09-CV-70875
Defendant:
M H Detrick Co.
Plaintiff:
William M. Morris
William M. Morris v. The Flintkote Co., et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-70842
Defendant:
The Flintkote Co
Plaintiff:
William M. Morris
William M. Morris v. Champion International Corporati, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-70296
Defendant:
Champion International Corporati
Plaintiff:
William M. Morris
MORRIS v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC et al
as 2:2009cv69985
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM M. MORRIS
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC, AC&S, INC, ASARCO INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BISHOP et al v. GUGLIOTTA et al
as 2:2007cv73709
Plaintiff:
ANDREW J. BISHOP, HARRY R. CATSBAN, WILLIAM T. CRIBBS and others
Defendant:
NORMAN J. GUGLIOTTA, LOUIE D. PARKER, COOPER INDUSTRIES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
