Cases 1 - 10 of 23
PARSONS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv19975
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM PARSONS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PARSONS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv23666
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM PARSONS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PARSONS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv13821
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM PARSONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PARSONS-SHIFFLETT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv79004
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM PARSONS-SHIFFLETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PARSONS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv02065
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM PARSONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JACKSON et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03275
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FRANZ, JASON MENDEZ, THAD TANAKA and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jackson et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02233
Plaintiff:
Michael Franz, Jason Mendez, Thad Tanaka and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Parsons v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv04700
Plaintiff:
William Parsons
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv12511
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lapinski v. St. Croix Condominium Association, Inc. et al
as 6:2016cv01418
Plaintiff:
James F. Lapinski
Defendant:
St. Croix Condominium Association, Inc., Douglas Cook, Fifth District Court of Appeals of Florida and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
