Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Todd McElroy v. R. Baker, et al
as 23-11805
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TODD MCELROY
Defendant / Appellee:
R. STAN BAKER, CHRISTOPHER L. RAY and WILLIAM T. MOORE, JR.
McElroy v. Baker et al
as 4:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
Todd McElroy
Defendant:
US District Judge R. Stan Baker, US Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray and Sr US District Judge William T. Moore, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Calvin James v. United States Attorney General, et al
as 22-5055
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Calvin B. James
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Attorney General, William T. Moore, Judge, Chris L. Ray and others
James v. Moore et al
as 4:2021cv00327
Plaintiff:
Calvin James
Defendant:
Judge William T. Moore, Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray and Dist. Court Clerk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. United States
as 4:2020cv00125
Defendant:
Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith, William T. Moore, Christopher Ray and others
Plaintiff:
Karteau O. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. United States
as 1:2020cv01482
Defendant:
United States, William T. Moore, Christopher Ray and others
Plaintiff:
Karteau O. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Moore et al
as 4:2019cv00243
Defendant:
Judge Christopher L. Ray, Agent Brent Minton, Judge Stan Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Karteau Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frank Monsegue, Sr. v. Hiral Mehta, et al
as 19-11009
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANK D. MONSEGUE, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
MILDRED M. WHALEN, Individually and in his Official capacity, MARILYN D. GO, Individually and in his Official capacity, HIRAL D. MEHTA, Individually and in his Official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
